check this clip from Camon Hero!!

Fanzhon wrote:

Axolotl wrote:If they don't keep it in there I'll be thoroughly disappointed.

I'm just saying. Besides, you're supposed to be at least 13 to take part in "online interactions" anyway. Every 13-year-old knows what parts of girls bounce around and that they wear panties.

People always complain I'm posting inappropriate material or phrasing things in a way which is immoral and unnecessary due to the "possibility" a child may be viewing a board. While in all honesty, I see no reason a child would willingly want to "read" paragraphs of text in an intellectual discussion.

If the child is that interested in peoples opinions surely they've seen more than petty "sexual innuedos" on the net. I blame the parents, not myself if the kid is left unattended and stumbles upon pr0n or something related to mature content.

Admin wrote:

Fanzhon wrote:

Axolotl wrote:If they don't keep it in there I'll be thoroughly disappointed.

I'm just saying. Besides, you're supposed to be at least 13 to take part in "online interactions" anyway. Every 13-year-old knows what parts of girls bounce around and that they wear panties.

People always complain I'm posting inappropriate material or phrasing things in a way which is immoral and unnecessary due to the "possibility" a child may be viewing a board. While in all honesty, I see no reason a child would willingly want to "read" paragraphs of text in an intellectual discussion.

If the child is that interested in peoples opinions surely they've seen more than petty "sexual innuedos" on the net. I blame the parents, not myself if the kid is left unattended and stumbles upon pr0n or something related to mature content.

Lol. No speak of Lorali on my forums!